Showing posts with label medical. Show all posts
Showing posts with label medical. Show all posts

Patient Centered Medical Home PCMH Attributes and Correlation With Staff Morale Satisfaction and Burn Out From Bad to Not So Bad to So What

Sunday, March 23, 2014

Nice medical home laptop, but
how do I feel about it?
Over the years, the Disease Management Care Blog has repeatedly reminded the spouse of her particularly good fortune in marriage. Her lingering skepticism, however, has prompted the DMCB to amass further evidence of her marital bliss by

a) asking other spouses in similar relationships if they feel as fortunate and, if so,

b) collecting data about the DMCB-like personality traits in their husbands.

Bonhomie? Check.

Willingness to share the TV remote? Check.

Cooking the occasional meal at great personal sacrifice? Check.

Announcing how good that meal is? Check.

Yet, when confronted with the indisputable statistical associations that correlate nuptial happiness and DMCB"ness," the spouse has remained stubbornly unmoved. At the spouses pointed request, the DMCB is rechecking the math.

Readers will probably also remain unmoved about this publication that uses a similar approach to examining the impact of the Patient Centered Medical Home (PCMH) on clinic staff morale, satisfaction and burnout. Sara Lewis and colleagues surveyed the staff of 65 "safety net" clinics participating in a "5 Year Safety Net Medical Home Initiative" that had been co-funded by the Commonwealth Fund.

At the time of the survey, the 65 clinics were in the process of implementing becoming PCMHs but had not yet attained that status. The authors used a Likert-style survey to assess PCMH-"like" attributes among these non-PCMH clinics, such as patient access, data tracking, care management and quality improvement.  The survey also asked about staff morale, satisfaction and burnout.  The authors then correlated whether individual scores or a total roll-up score of all the PCMH-like attributes correlated with better clinic morale, higher satisfaction and less burn out.

There were 773 providers and staff members and 603 (78%) responded. 33% rated morale as good, 54% rated job satisfaction as very good and 40% had some burnout.  Based on an analysis of odds ratios, some features of a PCMH - particularly quality improvement - resulted in up to a three fold improvement in the three measures. However, while the total PCMH score was associated with better morale, it looked like there was also a greater association with worse burn-out, which had a statistically significant lower odds ratio of .48.

The DMCB finds these up and down results about the PCMH in nonPCMH clinics unconvincing.  It believes the attributes of a PCMH, if carried out as envisioned, should add up to more than the sum of its parts.  While some of the parts that are outside of a medical home seem, according to this paper, to correlate with morale, satisfaction and burnout, this gives little insight on how medical staff would really react to the transformation of a primary care clinic.  By the way, this is not the first time a PCMH-"like: methodology has been used, which makes the DMCB wonder if fully functioning PCMHs are less common than we think.

What is striking, however, are the basic measures of morale, stress and burnout. Based on these data, it would appear that these safety net clinics have some serious staff issues with 67% not having good morale, 46% not having good job satisfaction and just under half having burn out.

More evidence of primary cares travails says the DMCB.

The good news is that the DMCB remains optimistic that the math will eventually bring the DMCB spouse around.  Maybe the enthusiasm - and the math - about the PCMH will similarly prevail someday.  Until then, this papers approach doesnt lend much insight about the real potential of the PCMH. Last but not least, if these 65 clinics are representative of primary care morale, satisfaction and burnout in general, the DMCB far less optimistic about their future with or without the PCMH.
readmore

It Costs How Much to Launch a Patient Centered Medical Home

Saturday, February 22, 2014

HOW much for the PCMH?!*
According to Drs. Gill and Bagley, writing in the Annals of Family Medicine, the costs of transforming a primary care practice to a Patient Centered Medical Home should be generously borne by "payers."

While wishful thinking about payers deep pockets is not new, the article has some eye-opening data (with Disease Management Care Blog provided links) on just how much some or all of the elements of a PCMH cost:

a) $1850 per month per practice or $17,000 per physician,

b) $5,600 start-up then $2,200 per year related to the costs of reporting outcomes,

c) $117,000 per physician per year, and

d) up to approximately $15,000 per practice per year for a management facilitator. 

No wonder the DMCBs friends in academia want someone else to pay for it.

In the meantime, companies like this continue to offer a different business model. Instead of rebuilding and equipping an entire primary care practice for a croup-to-guts "transformation," population health (definition here) service providers focus on those patients who are at highest risk and provide a modular combination of in as well as outsourced services. While there is no head-to-head cost comparison of PH vs. PCMH, it would appear that the per patient approach of PH has a competitive pricing advantage.

Stocking up for
allergy season
And speaking of outsourced services, the DMCB joins its other colleagues in looking forward to EHRs "meaningful use" criteria go from being meaningless to being truly meaningful.

For an under-recognized example of just how meaningful things will become, check out this interesting blog posting that describes the use of cloud-based EHR-data to follow U.S. allergy statistics.

While the information is interesting on its own merits, think how these data could be used by savvy providers to match allergy "market demand" by "stocking" a "just-in-time" "inventory" of allergy-care services such as patient reminder campaigns (for those with allergy-provoked asthma, "be sure to use your peak flow meter!") extra condition-specific appointments ("your provider with allergy expertise can see you this morning!"), treatments slots (nebulizers and immunotherapy ready to go) and medications (OTCs and prescription meds for the in-house pharmacy).


*Image from Wikipedia
readmore

Managed Care Insurer Medical Directors A Recruiting Opportunity for Provider Organizations That Are Taking Insurance Risk

Wednesday, January 22, 2014

The investigative Disease Management Care Blog went dumpster diving outside the headquarters of a large health care organization and found this document:

MEMO

To: The Health System CEO

From:  The Front Line Docs

Re: Physician "Accountability" Leadership

Thank you for taking the time out of your busy schedule to meet with the medical staff last night.  Since you arrived here a year ago, we physicians have been looking forward to our quarterly meetings and appreciate that you were able to make it this time. Thank you also for arranging the hospital cafeteria to supply the sandwiches. They and the boxed raisins were delicious!

"The white coats," as you er to us, are very interested in your vision of the insurer-contracting opportunities around efficiency, cost reductions, "accountability" and "shared savings."  Like you, we are also concerned about unnecessary health care "waste" and "variation," and endorse your call to action, or rather inaction. The health insurers statististics that were reproduced in your presentation on the frequency of surgical procedures at our institution was very eye-opening. As a result, weve already started to let our patients know that, when a trip to the operating room cannot be justified, well do everything we can to achieve maximum cost-effectiveness with alternative evidence-based care pathways.

In light of the above, may I recommend that you strongly consider hiring a physician-leader with the skill-set necessary to spearhead these program initiatives. While the current Vice-President for Medical Affairs has many of the fine qualities weve come to expect of your hand-picked appointees, lets face it: he wouldnt know a PMPM if he personally passed one into a bedpan.

In my opinion, attributes of a such a physician leader should include:

1. A strong grasp of clinical and health economic outcomes, trending and statistical analysis.

2. A fundamental understanding of health insurance contracting.

3. A track record of interacting constructively with physicians, hospital administrators and community organizations.  In particular, he or should she be adept at handling many of the hostile questions you faced last night.  That way, you can "outsource" the anger management.

4. An ongoing commitment to patient care, including taking "call" with the rest of us. 

I would like to point out that such physicians can be found among the Medical Directors that work in many of the nations commercial health insurers.  While every commercial insurance plan has a senior-level ("Vice President") medical director, each if these executives usually has several medical directors reporting to him or her.  Since these individuals work in very hierarchical organizations with little chance of advancement, many would jump at the chance to deploy their skills in a risk-bearing provider organization like ours.  An enterprising head-hunter recruiter should have little trouble poaching some of these highly skilled docs who possess precisely the kind of talent we need.

Once again, thank you for your time and I look forward to working with you in the future.

Sincerely yours,

(illegible)

There was a also hand written note appended at the bottom:

By the way, Ive booked the MRI you requested and set up the appointment with the specialist.  As we discussed, better safe than sorry!
readmore